Global Cosmetic Compliance
Intelligence & Solutions
Home / News / Details

Analysis of China's Regulatory Requirements for Potentially Allergenic Cosmetics

For consumers with sensitive skin, certain cosmetic ingredients may trigger allergic reactions. Factors such as ingredient composition, concentration, and purity, as well as product usage conditions, application sites, skin contact time, use frequency, and storage can all impact sensitisation. In light of this, the cosmetics industry is increasingly prioritizing the use of safe and effective ingredients in their products. To ensure regulatory compliance in China, enterprises must be vigilant about allergenic ingredients and comply with relevant testing requirements. This article provides an overview of common allergens found in cosmetics and outlines China's regulatory requirements for potentially allergenic cosmetics.

Common Allergens Found in Cosmetic Products

Regarding the common allergens in cosmetics, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) compiles scientific information, including natural rubber, certain fragrances, preservatives, colorants, and metals. 1

1. Natural rubber

Natural rubber, and it is sometimes labeled as "rubber latex".

2. Fragrance

Fragrances, whether naturally derived or chemically synthesized, are generally considered the most common allergens in cosmetics. While the specific components of fragrance are typically not listed on the ingredient label, they are uniformly labeled as "fragrance" or "flavor".

As released by the EU, the below 26 common fragrances may lead to allergy:

Group A

Amyl cinnamal (122-40-7), Amyl Cinnamal Alcohol (101-85-9), Benzyl Alcohol (100-51-6), Benzyl Salicylate (118-58-1), Cinnamyl Alcohol (104-54-1), Cinnamal (104-55-2), Citral (5392-40-5), Coumarin (91-64-5), Eugenol (97-53-0), Geraniol (106-24-1), Hydroxycitronellal (107-75-5), Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (31906-04-4), Isoeugenol (97-54-1)

Group B*

Anise Alcohol (105-13-5), Benzyl Benzoate (120-51-4), Benzyl Cinnamate (103-41-3), Citronellol (106-22-9), Farnesol (4602-84-0), Hexyl Cinnamal (101-86-0), Butylphenyl Methypropional (80-54-6), Limonene (5989-27-5), Linalool (78-70-6), Methyl 2-Octynoate (111-12-6), Alpha-Isomethyl lonone (127-51-5)

 

*Allergy reports of fragrances in group B were less frequent than in group A.

Supplement

Evernia Prunastri (Oakmoss) Extract (90028-68-5), Evernia Furfuracea (Treemoss) Extract (90028-67-4)

China has proposed labeling requirements for fragrance allergens in children's cosmetics. Technical Guidelines for Children's Cosmetics (Draft for Comments), released on April 11, 2022, encourages the avoidance of fragrances and flavors in children's cosmetics, especially those that may contain any of the above 26 fragrance allergens. If a fragrance that contains these allergens is used,

  • A full safety assessment must be conducted;

  • For leave-on products whose fragrance allergens exceed 0.001%, or rinse-off products with a concentration of fragrance allergens exceeding 0.01%, the specific name of the allergen must be labeled, accompanied by the guiding word "Contains Allergens".

3. Preservatives

Preservatives in cosmetics play an important role in inhibiting the growth and reproduction of microorganisms. However, they are also among the most common allergens and may cause contact dermatitis. To address this issue, cosmetics manufacturers have implemented various measures, such as reducing preservative amounts, selecting safer alternatives, and utilizing specialized containers to prevent contamination.

Common preservative allergens include:

1) Methylisothiazolinone (MIT, 2682-20-4)

2) Methylchloroisothiazolinone (CMIT, 26172-55-4)

3) Formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing ingredients:

  • 2-Bromo-2-Nitropropane-1,3-Diol (52-51-7)

  • 5-Bromo-5-Nitro-1,3-Dioxane (30007-47-7)

  • Diazolidinyl Urea (78491-02-8)

  • Dmdm Hydantoin (6440-58-0)

  • Imidazolidinyl Urea (39236-46-9)

  • Sodium Hydroxymethylglycinate (70161-44-3)

  • Quaternium-15 (4080-31-3, 51229-78-8)

4. Colorants

Common colorant allergens include:

  • p-Phenylenediamine (PPD, 106-50-3)

  • Coal tar colorant

5. Metals

Common metal allergens include:

  • Nickel

  • Gold

China's Testing Requirements for Allergenicity of Cosmetics

1. Skin sensitisation testing requirements for cosmetic products

Regarding skin sensitisation testing for cosmetic products, three situations may require such testing. 2 The relevant testing requirements and permitted testing methods are shown in the table below.

No.

Situations

Testing Requirements

Testing Method

1

Special Cosmetics (Hair dyes, hair perming products, freckle-removing and whitening products, sunscreen, anti-hair loss products)

A skin sensitisation test is required when applying for product registration.

It is required to adopt the testing methods specified by NMPA, which are the skin sensitisation test methods outlined in Chapter 6 of the Safety and Technical Standards for Cosmetics 2015 (STSC).

It is required to adopt the skin sensitisation test methods specified by NMPA, which are outlined in Chapter 6 of the Safety and Technical Standards for Cosmetics 2015 (STSC).

2

General Cosmetics

Products containing ≥0.5% (w/w) of chemical sunscreen agents (except rinse-offs, perfumes, and nail polishes) are required to be tested for skin sensitisation.

3

Cosmetic Safety Assessment

The skin sensitisation of each ingredient in the cosmetic product shall be assessed.

Testing data obtained through internationally accepted testing methods, such as animal testing, alternative methods, and clinical tests (e.g., Human Repeat Insult Patch Test, HRIPT), can be used as evidence for ingredient sensitisation assessment.

2. Permitted testing methods for skin sensitisation

At present, the cosmetic sensitisation testing methods accepted by NMPA can be divided into two categories: animal testing and non-animal testing.

1) Animal testing

Animal Testing Methods

Applicable Scope

Introduction

Buehler Test (BT)

Applicable to the determination of skin sensitisation of cosmetic products and chemical ingredients used in cosmetics.

The two most traditional testing methods for skin sensitisation are included in Chapter 6 of STSC. The basic principle of the two methods is that the test animals are initially exposed to the test substance by intradermal injection and/or epidermal application (induction exposure). Following a rest period of 10 to 14 days (induction period), the animals are exposed to a challenge dose. The extent and degree of skin reaction to the challenge exposure in the test animals is compared with that demonstrated by control animals which undergo sham treatment during induction and receive the challenge exposure.

Guinea Pig Maximinatim Test (GPMT)

Local Lymph Node Assay: DA (LLNA: DA)

Applicable to the determination of skin sensitisation of chemical ingredients used in cosmetics.

In 2019, the LLNA: DA and LLNA: BrdU-ELISA testing methods were officially included in STSC. These methods evaluate the skin sensitisation potential of the test substance by comparing the lymphocyte proliferation degree in the local reflux lymph nodes of mice in the test group and the control group.

 

Compared to traditional testing methods such as BT and GPMT, LLNA: DA and LLNA: BrdU-ELISA offer several advantages, including shorter testing cycles, higher sensitivity, and less animal consumption.

Local Lymph Node Assay: BrdU-ELISA (LLNA: BrdU-ELISA)

2) Non-animal testing

Currently, the only non-animal testing method accepted by NMPA is In Chemico Skin Sensitisation: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA).

Non-animal Testing Methods

Applicable Scope

Introduction

In Chemico Skin Sensitisation: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA)

Applicable to the determination of skin   sensitisation of chemical ingredients used in cosmetics.

This testing method targets key event 1 (KE1) in the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) of skin sensitisation. It is a chemical test method that uses High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) to determine the consumption of cysteine and lysine polypeptides, to assess the sensitisation potential of the compound. This method offers several advantages, including simplicity, high efficiency, and ease of use.

Notes:

In addition to the above method, China National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC) has proposed three draft non-animal testing methods. These methods are In Chemico Skin Sensitisation - Amino Acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA), In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: Human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT), and In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: U937 Cell Line Activation Test (U-SENS™), targeting AOP KE1, AOP KE3, and AOP KE3, respectively.

It should be noted that currently,

  • There is no non-animal testing method that can independently evaluate the skin sensitisation potential of a test substance. It is necessary to select an appropriate testing method based on the actual nature of the test substance and use a combination strategy to fully evaluate the skin sensitisation potential for cosmetic ingredients;

  • For finished cosmetic products, only animal testing methods (BT and GPMT) can be accepted to evaluate skin sensitisation.

China's Special Requirements related to Allergenicity of Cosmetics

1. Cosmetic Efficacy Claims

According to Standards for Cosmetic Efficacy Claim Evaluation, if a cosmetic product claims to be suitable for sensitive skin, it must be evaluated for its efficacy claims. This requires evidence such as human body efficacy evaluation test data or consumer use test data to support the claim.

The commonly used human body efficacy evaluation test is the human patch test, including the closed patch test and HRIPT. The closed patch test involves placing suspected allergens in an appropriate proportion in a patch tester and applying it to the subject's back or forearm flexion for 24 hours. Skin reaction will be evaluated by professionals at half an hour, and 24 hours to 48 hours after the application. When cosmetics have irritating results that are difficult to judge, HRIPT is additionally required. To ensure compliance with the human patch test requirements, enterprises can refer to the draft Technical Guidelines for Human Patch Test issued by NIFDC on April 27, 2023.

2. Cosmetic Adverse Reaction Monitoring

On October 1, 2022, NMPA implemented the Measures for the Management of Cosmetic Adverse Reaction Monitoring (hereinafter referred to as the “Measures”), setting out systematic requirements for the monitoring of adverse reactions of cosmetics.

According to the Measures, cosmetics registrants and notifiers are required to establish and implement a cosmetics adverse reaction (e.g. skin allergy) monitoring and evaluation system. The system requires actively collecting reports from entrusted manufacturers, cosmetics operators, medical institutions, consumers, and other relevant parties concerning adverse reactions to their marketed cosmetics. In addition, cosmetic registrants and notifiers must analyze and evaluate adverse reactions that are serious and may cause greater social impact, and compile self-inspection reports accordingly.

BANNER 810 150  gif.gifFurther Reading

We provide full-scale global cosmetic market entry services (including cosmetic registering & filing, regulatory consultation, customized training, market research, branding strategy). Please contact us to discuss how we can help you by [email protected]
Copyright: unless otherwise stated all contents of this website are ©2026 - REACH24H Consulting Group - All Rights Reserved - For permission to use any content on this site, please contact [email protected]
User Guide